Passive Solar Heating in Built Environment
Definition and Importance of Passive Solar Heating
Passive solar heating is the use of solar energy to heat a building without mechanical or electrical energy. The architecture and construction capture, store, and distribute the sun's energy. Every building with windows exposed to the sun is passively heated, but heat losses may exceed the solar gains. Accordingly, if the passive heat gain is to reduce heating costs, the system heat losses must be minimized. Ideally, the concept includes mass to store daytime solar heat for nights, increasing the usability of the gains. Finally, the heating system must shut off when solar heating achieves the desired room temperature. Two constraints on passive solar use are glare control and shading during non-heating months.
Maximizing usable passive solar gains is an important design aspect, but often designers focus only on minimizing heat losses. Taking the finance world as an analogy, no one will accumulate wealth through savings alone, income must be maximized and wisely invested. So, not only reducing heat loss is essential to low energy architecture, maximizing solar gains is important, as it has been over the history of building.
An often cited early example of solar design awareness is the "Megaron House" described by Socrates in the year 400 B.C. Numerous other examples can be found, i.e., the New England "salt box" of the seventeenth century or Swiss farm houses of the eighteenth century. In the twentieth century, the term "solar house " became popular and following the first oil shock of 1973, the term "passive solar buildings " was coined. In all these examples, the basic principles are the same; maximize the south exposure of a building to capture as much solar heat as possible and insulate the enclosure well to keep the heat in.
- Long-term (>10 years) good return on the investment
- Economy and security as future fossil fuel prices increase and supply subject to interruptions
- Living qualities of passive solar buildings flooded with light and natural warmth (Fig. 1)
![]() |
| Passive Solar Heating in Built Environment. Figure 1 A living room flooded with sunlight from large south-facing windows (photo source: robert.hastings@aeu.ch) |
Introduction
Concepts
Buildings that consume less fossil fuel are "nice to have" today, but will be essential in the future. Since buildings are long-term investments, they must be built or rebuilt looking to the future.
Heating is a major use of energy in buildings and dependence on fossil fuels for heating can be dramatically reduced through two strategies: reducing heat loses and increasing the use of solar heat. Logically, a combination of these two strategies is desirable.
- Passive solar use does not rely on mechanical components to capture, store, and distribute the heat, the building construction fulfills these functions.
- Active solar use typically involves a remote solar collector and a pump or fan to transfer the heat to storage and from storage to point of use.
- The annual heating requirement must be less than 15 kWh/(m2a) or maximum heating power 10 W/m2a based on the net heated floor area.
- The combined primary energy consumption for heating, hot water and household electricity may not exceed 120 kWh/(m2a).
- The air leakage of the enclosure tested under a pressured difference of 50 Pa (n50) may not exceed 0.6 house air volumes per hour.
A passive solar building is not defined to this extent; it simply describes a structure in which the designer deliberately maximized using solar energy passively. So, in fact, a passive house can also be a passive solar house and indeed, in the planning recommendation for a passive house, using passive solar energy is encouraged and credited.
Three passive solar heating concepts were defined after the first oil shock of 1973 and are still useful today: 
Direct gain : Windows capture the sun in a well-insulated building; interior construction mass stores the potentially excess daytime gains into the night; and some form of shading provides comfort during non-heating seasons. Direct gain is the oldest and still most cost-effective concept, given its potential to also enhancing the quality of life in buildings. 
Indirect gain : The building envelope captures solar heat, which is then conducted and/or convected to the building interior, possibly with a time delay of up to 8 h. Alternatively, the goal may be simply to capture enough solar heat in the envelope construction to eliminate heat losses from the building much of the time, i.e., a dynamic U-value over the heating season approaching zero. Indirect gain systems nicely compliment direct gain systems. 
Isolated gain passive : Solar energy is converted to heat outside the insulated building envelope and then deliverd to the building interior or storage. This can be by gravity-driven convection, or with the help of a small fan (a "hybrid" system). While not purely passive, hybrid systems are reported here because the proportion of delivered heat to electrical energy is so small. 
A sunspace or attached greenhouse with controlled opening to the building is also an isolated gain system. Isolated gain systems are the most complex and expensive, but offer the most control of when and how much solar heat is delivered into the building.
It can be useful to consider passive solar heating opportunities by building types and climates. Note, that in this section, locations north of the equator are assumed. South of the equator, north orientations have priority.
Building Types
- As the ratio of enclosing surface to enclosed volume increases, heat loss increases, so a solar heating can be more beneficial.
- As the density of heat production from people or appliances increases, the usefulness of solar heat decreases.
- Direct solar gains in the form of heat and light are a combined asset, i.e., for hospitals, old age homes, and schools as well as residences. (Examples and Design insights for passive solar use in commercial and institutional buildings were researched and documented in an IEA project [2].
The energy optimization of a building must balance passive solar and daylight benefits against mechanical cooling and electric lighting energy demands, both of which have very high primary energy factors.
Climates
Northern climates such as Scandinavia would seem to pose a problem for passive solar use. Winter days are short, the sun is weak, and the sun path is at a very low angle. This means, however, that windows or vertical collection surfaces intercept the sun at a more direct angle. Furthermore, the heating season is very long, extending from early autumn to late spring. Before 21 September or after 21 March, heating is still needed, when days are longer than in southern latitudes. Passive solar concepts must maximize the usefulness of spring and autumn solar heating, while minimizing mid-winter heat losses.
Temperate climates are the ideal situation for passive solar buildings. Not just sunny temperate, but also overcast temperate climates. This has become possible with the development of very high-performance glass (U-value < 1.0 W/m2K). Consider the example of diffuse solar radiation at only 100 W/m2 for 6 h and an ambient temperature of 5°C. The solar gains through a glass with a g-value of 0.5 (admitting 50% of the solar radiation) will offset the 24 h heat losses of a glass with a U glass of 0.8 W/m2K. If the sun shines with more intensity or more hours, it is a passive solar winner. Because temperate climates often have hot summers, the concept must also include shading.
Mild climates offer a challenge: to achieve zero-heating energy buildings by combining passive solar design and conservation without degrading summer comfort. This is at least as challenging as achieving net-zero-energy buildings . The latter achieve a net zero balance by taking a credit from the summer electrical output of a large PV-roof (multiplied by a high primary energy factor) against the energy deficit in winter, which must somehow be met. Passive solar heating of a highly insulated building can answer part of the "somehow" question.
Strengths and Weaknesses
| + |
Living quality: daylight and naturally warmth from the sun's warmth. |
| + |
Security: in the event of energy supply interruptions. |
| + |
Costs: only the marginal costs of added aperture area, be it collector or window area and mass, must be amortized by energy savings. |
| + |
Return on investment: As energy prices rise, return on the investment in passive solar measures increasingly attractive. |
| + |
Low maintenance: There are no maintenance costs for pumps or fans. |
| + |
All of these factors can positively affect resale value of the property. |
| − |
Operation: often passive solar use requires active occupants adjusting sun-shading or opening windows or vents. |
| − |
Poorly designed or incorrectly used passive solar buildings may use more energy than conventional buildings. Informed design, strict quality control, and intelligent operation are essential. |
Road Map to This Section
A historic review of passive solar design shows how this approach has developed in parallel with technological developments of building components. It is instructive to examine which concepts came into existence, evolved, flourished, or died out. This may save reinventing a broken wheel, or ideas might arise for new variations or concepts.
Principles and applications review different approaches to passively capturing, storing, and using solar energy to heat buildings.
Direct, indirect, and isolated gain concepts are reported in detail.
Finally, the past, present, and future of passive solar heating are discussed in the context of expected energy supply developments, demographics, and increasingly well-insulated and automated buildings.
History
Concepts for passive solar heating date back millennia. Materials and components were very primitive by today's standards, but comfort expectations were also much lower. A net solar gain is possible even with single glazing if the required room temperature is only 16°C. The twentieth century saw dramatic developments in material science and production techniques, e.g., in glass production. The evolution in the last century has been equally spectacular. Single glazing at the beginning of the twentieth century (U = 5.8 W/m2K), evolved to fused double glazing in the 1950s (U = 2.8 W/m2K). Insulating glazing (U = 1.2 W/m2K) in the 1990s is now available in triple glazing (U = 0.5 W/m2K), or more than a factor 10 better than window glazing a century ago.
As a result, some concepts, which earlier proved ineffective for a given climate or building type, may indeed be effective today and should be "rediscovered." Following is a short-time journey through the evolution of passive solar heating.
Ancient times
![]() |
| Passive Solar Heating in Built Environment. Figure 2 The Megaron House concept described by Socrates |
1600-1900
![]() |
| Passive Solar Heating in Built Environment. Figure 3 A New England "salt box" house with large south façade and long protecting roof to the north (photo source: robert.hastings@aeu.ch) |
![]() |
| Passive Solar Heating in Built Environment. Figure 4 An Appenzell house with large window area protected by multiple roof projections (photo: robert.hastings@aeu.ch) |
1900-1950s
![]() |
| Passive Solar Heating in Built Environment. Figure 5 Direct gain maximized in the Duncan House (picture by permission of Pilkington, North America, Inc.) |
1960s
Oil was plentiful and cheap, everyone was happy, renewable energy was not a topic of any popular importance and very little happened.
1970-1980s
![]() |
| Passive Solar Heating in Built Environment. Figure 6 The Balcomb house in New Mexico (photo source: robert.hastings@aeu.ch) |
Passive solar use was a major topic of the American Solar Energy Society (ASES), a national organization linked with the International Solar Energy Society (ISES). These were the boom years for passive solar buildings. Research and demonstration projects were well funded at the federal and state levels. Atomic physicists "saw the light" and became solar building physicists at renowned national laboratories, including Los Alamos, Lawrence Berkeley, Brookhaven, and the National Bureau of Standards. Exemplary demonstration projects were sponsored by the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), an enormous interstate electrical utility. Regional solar energy centers oversaw the evaluation and publicizing of countless solar buildings.
- Gigantic data bases were computed using research computer models for all thinkable design variations, and then clever nomographs generated. The Passive Solar Handbook by Doug Balcomb and R. Jones is a classic example [8].
- Simplified calculation tools were programmed, such as SERIRES (later called SUNREL) and CALPAS. These were small enough to run on the first versions of portable computers ("mini" or "midi" computers).
The goal was to learn how sensitive performance was to a given parameter. To demonstrate how terrific a design was, it was useful to compare it to a conventional builder house of the time. For this purpose three reference houses were defined, based on statistics from the national home builders association (NHBA). The reference designs were published by the National Bureau of Standards (NBS, today NIST) [9].
![]() |
| Passive Solar Heating in Built Environment. Figure 7 NBS (NIST) test house 1980, Gaithersburg, MD (architect and photo source: robert.hastings@aeu.ch) |
Meanwhile at universities, architecture schools continued to teach Le Corbusier as the model for good design. Energy and solar use were not significant design issues, with the exceptions of a small but growing number of architecture and engineering professors. They were the authors of some superb text books, which clearly presented passive solar design principles. Some examples are a passive solar textbook for architects [10], a guide for adapting solar concepts to regional climates and constructions across the whole continent [11], and guidelines for window design strategies to conserve energy [12].
![]() |
| Passive Solar Heating in Built Environment. Figure 8 The Michel-Trombe wall house in Odello, FR (photo: robert.hastings@aeu.ch) |
1990s
Europeans began to take interest in the American passive solar movement. Many architects and building researchers travelled to the United States to personally visit passive solar houses . Passive houses began to appear across Europe, from Scandinavia to Italy. National research programs investigated how to optimize passive solar concepts to local European climates and constructions. This was essential. Several passive solar buildings did not function as hoped. Europe gets less sun than New Mexico!
During this time, windows were still mostly double glazed or at best triple glazed (U glass = 3.0 or 2.2 W/m2K). Glazing with selective coatings and noble gas fillings were just beginning to enter the market. Accordingly, only windows facing south achieved a net passive solar gain. In northern climates, night insulation of windows was needed for the long dark winters. Several innovative, but expensive roll-down insulating blankets were developed for windows. These largely disappeared from the market as high-performance glazings appeared.
By the end of the 1990s, the growing pains of adapting passive solar architecture to European climates and constructions were over and countless exemplary projects had been built and published. An IEA SHC program searched out and documented exemplary projects [14].
2000
![]() |
| Passive Solar Heating in Built Environment. Figure 9 An Austrian passive solar house with solar air radiant heating and a sunspace in Nüziders, Vorarlberg (architect and photo source: Sture Larsen, www.solarsen.com) |
By the year 2000, a new concept, The Passivhaus (Passive House ) had become well established and on the way to becoming the new mark of excellence in low-energy design. It came out of the PHD work of Wolfgang Feist under his Professor, Bo Adamson in Sweden. To reach this standard requires a highly insulated, thermal bridge-free, and airtight building enclosure. Mechanical ventilation is needed to assure good air quality by such tight construction. Heat from exhaust air is then recovered to preheat incoming air. The ventilation air can be used to deliver the small amount of heating needed (maximum 15 kWh/m2 heated floor area). Obviously, passive solar heating of such houses is also desired, but challenging to dimension because of the small heating load and short heating season.
2010
Today, in the second decade of the new millennium, the term "passive solar heating" is less common. This is paradoxical because with new window frame and glazing systems, highly insulated building envelopes, and sophisticated heating control systems, passive solar gains can cover all heating needs for an extended part of the year in temperate climates. However, the interaction between passive solar gains, internal gains and envelope heat loss needs to be carefully studied to assure comfort and the hope for energy savings.
The former research computer models to study passive solar building concepts, requiring several hours on a main frame computer, today can run in seconds on a laptop. However, today's tools do not consider many of the phenomena the former models did, such as when mass is directly sunlit or only indirectly warmed by room air, or how passive solar heat in south rooms convects to other rooms. This can strongly affect passive solar usability and comfort.
Principles, Applications, and Integration
Principles
Passive solar heating requires glass, frames, seasonal sun shading, mass, and extra planning effort. The economics are clear: energy won is more expensive than the energy saved by adding insulation or eliminating air leakage up to a certain point. However, as the insulation thickness is increased, the marginal energy and economic benefits of the next increment decrease. Further, when conventional thicknesses are exceeded, the costs of anchoring the insulation and detailing jump. In contrast to this, the cost of a larger window is not proportional to the window area increase. Larger windows loose less heat per unit area. There is less perimeter for the glass area, so edge losses are smaller. Also, there are increased benefits such as more daylight, the view outside and sense of well being from being sun-warmed (especially for cats). The challenging questions are therefore, which passive solar heating concept is most effective for a given building type and climate, and how big should the system be?
Applications by Building Types
Well-Suited Building Types
Residences are the most common passive solar application. Detached single-family houses with four outside walls, a roof, and earth contact can best benefit from passive solar gains. Row houses and apartment buildings have many units with only two exposures. If they face east and west, passive solar heating is difficult. One idea would be to install an indirect gain system on the south-facing end walls to compliment morning and afternoon direct gains.
Large buildings suitable for passive solar indirect heating include warehouses, gyms (American), or athletic halls (i.e., tennis halls) [2]. Because a lower air temperature is acceptable or even desired, passive solar gains can make a greater contribution to meeting the heating demand. Heat losses of glazed areas decrease proportionately with less inside to outside temperature difference. Lower required space temperatures increase system efficiency and number of hours when useful passive solar heat can be delivered.
Swimming pool halls are a potentially good building type for passive solar heating because a high air temperature is needed, so there is a very long heating season, well into long day spring and fall seasons. Also, there is a great appeal for the space being sunlit. Direct gain, indirect gain for radiant comfort, and isolated solar air systems for humidity control are possibilities.
Limited Cases
![]() |
| Passive Solar Heating in Built Environment. Figure 10 A Swiss school in Gumpenwiese ZH with sunspaces tied into the ventilation concept [16] (photo: robert.hastings@aeu.ch) |
Old-age homes, nursing homes, and hospitals can benefit especially from direct gain with daylighting. Indirect gains systems to supply heat at night or isolated gain systems to preheat ventilation supply air are further possibilities. The occupancy tends to be "24/7" and demand somewhat higher room temperatures, extending the heating season.
Hotels have a transient occupancy. Guest rooms may be vacant with no internal loads for heating, but must be kept at room temperature or, if the thermostat is set back, very quickly warmed up. Accordingly, passive solar gains to maintain a minimal room temperature can be very useful, but mass can slow the heat-up. Daylight and view out may be assets, but overheating is totally unacceptable. Hotels in cities often may have to be isolated from traffic or airport noise. This can be solved with acoustical glazing or by using an indirect or isolated passive solar concept.
New Construction Verses Renovation
New construction should have very low energy demand as a result of very good insulation, mechanical ventilation with heat recovery. They likely will have a sophisticated heat production, delivery, and control system. Therefore, internal heat from occupancy and appliances will maintain the desired room temperature later in autumn and earlier in spring. The design of passive solar heating must consider this shorter heating season. Storing solar heat is very important because the gains can quickly exceed demand and result in overheating. Ideally, the thermal mass should be sunlit directly. Indirect passive solar systems can contribute to helping shorten the heating season.
![]() |
| Passive Solar Heating in Built Environment. Figure 11 Renovation with solar and conservation, 60 examples of projects across Europe and Canada [17] |










