> > Female Genital Cutting: Social and Cultural Dimensions of the Practice and the Debates1

This is the free portion of the full article. The full article is available to licensed users only.
How do I get access?

Female Genital Cutting

Introduction

Having little parallel in its ability to arouse an emotional response, the practice of female genital cutting (FGC) has come under increasingly intense international scrutiny from news media, feminist and human rights organizations, health practitioners, and legislators. A reclassification has taken place: the local has become a global concern, "female circumcision" has become "female genital mutilation," and a "traditional practice" has become a "human rights violation." Under the gaze of international attention, this issue has come to constitute a site for a number of emotionally charged debates around cultural relativism, international human rights, racism and Western imperialism, medicalization, sexuality, and patriarchal oppression of women, resulting in an onslaught of discussion and writing on the topic. Yet misunderstanding, confusion, and controversy over the complex dimensions of this issue have not been resolved.

The intervention of outsiders